8th JPrivIntL Conference 2019
Search
  • Home
  • Registration
  • Programme
    • Thursday
    • Friday
    • Saturday
  • Contact
  • Venue
  • Leisure
  • Home
  • Registration
  • Programme
    • Thursday
    • Friday
    • Saturday
  • Contact
  • Venue
  • Leisure
  • Presentation

    Law applicable to contract on the entrustment of personal data for processing

    Dr. Piotr Rodziewicz
    University of Wroclaw
    Poland

    Saturday, 14 September – 11:00 am
    Room V U107, Faculty of Law – Professor-Huber-Platz 2, 80539 Munich

  • Presentation

    Application of Private International Law in Islamic Banking Contract: A Special Reference to Recognition of Islamic Banking Contract in Malaysia

    Nur Zuleikha Zakaria
    Polytechnic Kuching Sarawak
    Malaysia

    Saturday, 14 September – 11:00 am
    Room W 401, Faculty of Law – Professor-Huber-Platz 2, 80539 Munich

  • Presentation

    Brazilian ratification of CISG and Standard Contracts of GAFTA & FOSFA clauses of non-applicability of the Convention

    Fernanda Bauer
    UERJ-Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
    Brazil

    Thursday, 12 September – 2:00 pm
    Room W 101, Faculty of Law – Professor-Huber-Platz 2, 80539 Munich

  • Presentation

    The Proposal for a Regulation on the Law applicable to the third-party effects of Assignment of Claims

    Dimitrios K. Stamatiadis
    Democritus University of Thrace
    Greece

    Thursday, 12 September – 2:00 pm
    Room V 002, Faculty of Law – Professor-Huber-Platz 2, 80539 Munich

  • Abstract

    Practice does not make perfect: Rethinking the doctrine of ‘the proper law of the contract’ – a case for the Indian courts

    Dr. Saloni Khanderia
    O.P. Jindal Global University, Haryana
    India

    Thursday, 12 September – 2:00 pm
    Room V 002, Faculty of Law – Professor-Huber-Platz 2, 80539 Munich

    –

    Every contract with a transnational element calls for the determination of the law that would govern the transaction in the event of a dispute on the matter between the parties. In most civil law jurisdictions, and the United Kingdom, which is a common law system, the rules to identify the governing law has been codified – contributing to much certainty and predictability. At the same time, jurisdictions like India have continued to embrace the traditional precepts of the English common law even after the United Kingdom’s ratification to the Rome I Regulation on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations, 2008 (Rome I).

  • Abstract

    Conflict of Laws in Blockchain-Based Crypto-Assets 

    Prof. Koji Takahashi
    Doshisha University, Kyoto
    Japan

    Thursday, 12 September – 4:00 pm
    Room V U107, Faculty of Law – Professor-Huber-Platz 2, 80539 Munich

    –

    This paper will consider a range of choice-of-law issues arising from crypto-assets on blockchains.

    (1) Contractual issues. Suppose that a contract is concluded pursuant to which bitcoins are offered to purchase goods. Given that cryptocurrencies are not a fiat currency and might not be seen as goods, is that contract to be characterised as a “sale of goods”, a “barter of goods”, or a “barter of service for goods” for the choice-of-law purposes? Aside from the question of characterization, blockchains will not raise particularly difficult choice-of-law questions in contract since party autonomy is almost universally adopted.

Bard Theme by WP Royal.
Back to top